You are here

If moderation paid tax...

We live in a country of moderation. Only the Left is radical, because the Right is always considered, centrist, sensible and, well, moderate. By Mariana Mortágua.
Photo by Paulete Matos

Everyone calls for the values of the 25 April revolution, democracy and freedom. Everyone flies the flag of constitutional values, even if they voted against the constitution because they found it a bit out of fashion. In their speeches, everyone in Portugal is in favour of public education, the National Health Service and Social Security.

Look at the case of the tragic death of a patient at São José Hospital due to a lack of specialised medical care. Everyone is now singing the NHS’ praises and discussing how important it is for the country. But there are some, like Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, who voted against it being created. And there are some, like Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, who over the last four years have turned a blind eye every time another million was taken away from public health funding. And there are some, like the former Minister of Health, Paulo Macedo, who have ignored the four warnings issued by the Left Bloc about the specific situation at São José.

We have said it time and again: austerity kills. This isn’t slogan or populism. It’s the truth, and this case has demonstrated it in the most brutal way. It has shocked the country but it happens every day. It happens to a greater or lesser extent at hospitals, at old people's homes that can’t afford to pay for heating and medicine, in the lives of those who have lost their jobs and social support at the time they needed it most. They are the other side of the coin for the budget adjustments of which the PSD and the CDS are so proud.

Defending the welfare state isn't just a frame of mind. It is a practice, as well as an idea of society that the Right has long abandoned. It isn't compatible with the attempts to privatise and create franchises in the NHS (attempts made by the PS as well–there’s no point denying it–but most frequent in the last four years). It isn't compatible with the transfer of hospitals to charities. And it certainly isn't compatible with the more than €1.5bn in cuts made between 2011 and 2014. It’s worth reading "O Sistema de Saúde Português no Tempo da Troika: A Experiência dos Médicos” [The Portuguese Health System in the Troika Age: the Doctors’ Experience], a study done at ISCTE and released in June. Among the 3,000 doctors interviewed, 80% say that the cuts have affected the care given, 40% say that there has been a lack of medication, 23% have stopped using invasive methods because of a lack of available material and 60% say that the number of patients stopping treatment for economic reasons has increased.

Meanwhile, after the disaster has taken place, everyone declares their love for the NHS. There is no-one on the Right who takes responsibility or lays responsibility at the Troika’s door for the chaos it has left behind and the lives it has put at risk. There is no-one on the Right able to take a self-critical view of austerity. There is no-one on the Right who at least has the decency to say what they intend to do: create a health system reduced to basic care for the very poorest alongside a flourishing business of private hospitals and clinics. If we didn't live in a country of cynical moderation, I would say that this is the most radical idea of them all.

Article originally published in “Jornal de Notícias” on 29 December 2015. Translated by Tom Williams for

Sobre o/a autor(a)

Deputada. Dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda. Economista.
Termos relacionados English